Help get this topic noticed by sharing it on Twitter, Facebook, or email.
I’m sad

Confirmation of Errata for The Art of R Programming

The list of unconfirmed errata for The Art of R Programming contains items over a year old, and includes many true errata and other errata reported in error. For example the item for page 30 is merely the result of a misunderstanding on the part of the person reporting the errror. The result is that the list of errata may be confusing for anyone visiting the errata page who is already having difficulties with the text.

In contrast, the confirmed errata page is empty. Will this be corrected in the near future? If not, might it be possible to allow people to comment on errata, pointing out when they, too, are in error.
2 people have
this question