Help get this topic noticed by sharing it on Twitter, Facebook, or email.

Bad data (or bad code) for "Think Stats"?

Hi. I'm trying to use Think Stats. But the data (and the code online) does not seem to match the book. For example, when I run survey.py, I get many hundreds of errors reading the pregnancies table. These seem to be for fields that are in the code but not the book. I'm only on pg 5, so this is not a good start. Before I write a bad review, I thought I'd ask. Is this expected?
2 people have
this question
+1
Reply